Direct emissions
37,271
tCO2e
Back to search resultsSustainability
Scope
REPORTED REPORTED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)
Explore carbon emissions data for AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.
Emissions
Carbon emissions
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
41,069tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)
- Reported by AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets
- 40,719 tCO₂e
- Estimated by Mycelium
- 349 tCO₂e
AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets reported 99% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 1% for the categories it did not disclose.
Scope 1
tCO2e
37,271
Scope 2 (Location Based)
tCO2e
3,449
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
349
Not yet checked against the source report
Scope 3 reported
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset
See the scope breakdownProvenance
Sustainability
Snapshot
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
- AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets reported 40,719 tCO₂e in 2022.
- Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.
According to available emissions disclosures, AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets reported total yearly emissions of 40,719 tCO₂e in 2022. Scope 1 emissions accounted for 92% of the reported footprint, indicating the company's own operations, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles, were the most significant contributors to its carbon footprint.
The company does not have a Mycelium Score for 2022, because there is no revenue figure on file to measure its carbon intensity.
Scope
breakdown
Scope 1 emissions
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Scope 2 emissions
Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
3,449
tCO2eMarket based
–
tCO2eScope 3 emissions
Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
–
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
–
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
–
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
–
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
1
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
307
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
42
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
–
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
–
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
–
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
–
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
–
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
–
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
–
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
–
tCO2e3 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed, and Mycelium can't model them without a revenue figure for AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets, which it doesn't have yet.
Contact Info
Website
–
Country
Switzerland
Browse carbon emissions data by industry
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
How scoring works
How the Mycelium Score is calculated
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.
How the Transparency Score is calculated
The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.
AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets has disclosed the categories that carry most of its estimated footprint, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows which figures are reported and which are modelled.
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)Compare AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets with similar companies
AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets carbon emissions FAQs
What are AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets's carbon emissions?
In its 2022 reporting year, AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets disclosed total emissions of 40,719 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 41,069 tCO2e. Scope 1 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 92%.
Does AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?
For 2022, AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (37,271 tCO2e) and Scope 2 (3,449 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Is AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets sustainable?
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets does not have a Mycelium Score for 2022 yet. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.
Is AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets environmentally friendly?
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. AXA Investment Managers Schweiz AG – Real Assets disclosed 40,719 tCO2e for 2022. It does not have a Mycelium Score yet to compare that with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.