Back to search results

Fred. Olsen

bonheur.no 1.4

Explore carbon emissions data for Fred. Olsen. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Fred. Olsen, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

512,016 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

251,515

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

1,378

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

259,123

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Fred. Olsen's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
522,800 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
258,220
258,220
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
422,925
422,925
Total + all Scope 3
522,800
422,970

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Fred. Olsen reported 512,016 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 51% of emissions.
  • Reported across 9 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Fred. Olsen reported total yearly emissions of 512,016 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 51% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 1.4, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 33.0, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Total Emissions across all scopes

512,016 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

251,515

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

24

tCO2e

Market based

1,378

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

46,209

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

20,936

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

52,545

tCO2e

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

8,401

tCO2e

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

3,472

tCO2e

Cat 6

Business travel

20,544

tCO2e

Cat 7

Employee commuting

174

tCO2e

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

9,027

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

1,094

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

1,094

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

68,585

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

1,094

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

43

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

1,094

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

24,807

tCO2e

6 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Website

www.bonheur.no

Address

Fred. Olsens gate 2
OSLO
0152

Country

Norway

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Fred. Olsen's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

For Fred. Olsen, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 13% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Services company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories Fred. Olsen hasn't disclosed:

  • Investments (Scope 3 Category 15), around 5% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 18% of Fred. Olsen's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Fred. Olsen carbon emissions FAQs

What are Fred. Olsen's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, Fred. Olsen disclosed total emissions of 512,016 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 51% of the total.

Does Fred. Olsen report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, Fred. Olsen's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (251,515 tCO2e), Scope 2 (1,378 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 9 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Fred. Olsen's emissions reporting?

Fred. Olsen has a Mycelium transparency score of 33 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is Fred. Olsen sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Fred. Olsen has a Mycelium Score of 1.4 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Fred. Olsen environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Fred. Olsen disclosed 512,016 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 1.4 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.