Direct emissions
16,083,829
tCO2e
Back to search resultsEmissions
Sustainability
Scope
REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)
Mycelium Score0.5 / 10Significant room to improveDTransparencyLowLimited disclosure with significant gaps
Explore carbon emissions data for CMS Energy. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for CMS Energy, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.
Emissions
Carbon emissions
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
38,833,704tCO2e(Market Based)
Scope 1
tCO2e
16,083,829
Scope 2 (Market Based)
tCO2e
54,795
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
22,695,080
Not yet checked against the source report
Scope 3 reported
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset
See the scope breakdownProvenance
Emissions
Factors
2.862kgCO2e / $
Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / $)
Modelled
Reported
UpstreamScope 1, 2 + upstream Scope 3
2.862
2.163
Total+ all Scope 3
–
5.204
Per US dollar of revenue. Mycelium models the upstream factor only.
Which figure should I use?
Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. Any of those emissions the company has not disclosed are filled with modelled estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.
Looking at what the company filed itself? Use the Reported column. Total Reported also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Upstream Reported sits close to Upstream Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its upstream emissions.
Sustainability
Snapshot
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
- CMS Energy reported 38,833,704 tCO₂e in 2023.
- Scope 3 accounted for 58% of reported emissions.
- Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.
According to available emissions disclosures, CMS Energy reported total yearly emissions of 38,833,704 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 58% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.5, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 47.4, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.
Scope
breakdown
Scope 1 emissions
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Scope 2 emissions
Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
55,383
tCO2eMarket based USED IN TOTAL
54,795
tCO2eScope 3 emissions
Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
CMS Energy reported a Scope 3 total of 22,695,080 tCO₂e but did not break it down into the 15 categories. That is at least as much as Mycelium's model of the categories it did not report, so the reported figure stands in the total, and the estimates below show where it is likely to sit.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
196,717
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
248,632
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
4,717,668
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
23,778
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
18,093
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
1,675
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
7,016
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
3,286
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
59,192
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
129,878
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
4,117,155
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
10,317
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
5,838
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
–
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
337,466
tCO2e14 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. The company's own Scope 3 total is reported, it was simply filed as a single figure with no category split. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.
Contact Info
Website
www.cmsenergy.comCountry
United States of America
Browse carbon emissions data by industry
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
How scoring works
How the Mycelium Score is calculated
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. CMS Energy's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.
How the Transparency Score is calculated
The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.
CMS Energy reported a Scope 3 total of 22,695,080 tCO₂e but did not break it down into the 15 categories. It counts towards the footprint, but only a tenth of it counts as disclosed in the transparency score, because it does not show which categories it covers. Breaking it down would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)Compare CMS Energy with similar companies
CMS Energy carbon emissions FAQs
What are CMS Energy's carbon emissions?
In its 2023 reporting year, CMS Energy disclosed total emissions of 38,833,704 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 58%.
Does CMS Energy report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?
For 2023, CMS Energy's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (16,083,829 tCO2e), Scope 2 (54,795 tCO2e) and a Scope 3 total of 22,695,080 tCO2e without a category breakdown. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
How transparent is CMS Energy's emissions reporting?
CMS Energy has a Mycelium transparency score of 47.4 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.
Is CMS Energy sustainable?
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. CMS Energy has a Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.
Is CMS Energy environmentally friendly?
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. CMS Energy disclosed 38,833,704 tCO2e for 2023, and its Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.