Direct emissions
168,777
tCO2e
Back to search resultsEmissions
Sustainability
Scope
REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED ESTIMATED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED REPORTED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REPORTED 
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)
Mycelium Score2.5 / 10Below-average scoreATransparencyVery HighExtensive disclosure across almost all key areas
Explore carbon emissions data for Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.
Emissions
Carbon emissions
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
5,686,984tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)
- Reported by Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro
- 5,670,704 tCO₂e
- Estimated by Mycelium
- 16,280 tCO₂e
Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro reported more than 99% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining less than 1% for the categories it did not disclose.
Scope 1
tCO2e
168,777
Scope 2 (Location Based)
tCO2e
84,619
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
5,433,588
Figures from pages 99 and 100 of the source report
Scope 3 reported
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset
See the scope breakdownProvenance
Emissions
Factors
1.471kgCO2e / $
Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / $)
Modelled
Reported
UpstreamScope 1, 2 + upstream Scope 3
1.471
1.470
Total+ all Scope 3
–
1.703
Per US dollar of revenue. Mycelium models the upstream factor only.
Which figure should I use?
Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. Any of those emissions the company has not disclosed are filled with modelled estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.
Looking at what the company filed itself? Use the Reported column. Total Reported also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Upstream Reported sits close to Upstream Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its upstream emissions.
Sustainability
Snapshot
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
- Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro reported 5,670,704 tCO₂e in 2023.
- Scope 3 accounted for 96% of reported emissions.
- Reported across 12 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
- Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.
According to available emissions disclosures, Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro reported total yearly emissions of 5,670,704 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 96% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 2.5, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 99.9, an exceptional result, reflecting open disclosure across nearly every key emissions metric.
Scope
breakdown
Scope 1 emissions
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Scope 2 emissions
Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
84,619
tCO2eMarket based
–
tCO2eScope 3 emissions
Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
4,262,696
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
18,774
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
40,973
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
310,030
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
6,135
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
504
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
4,581
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
2,366
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
194,500
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
47,957
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
361,138
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
16,226
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
2,642
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
11,272
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
153,794
tCO2e3 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.
Verification
Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro's emissions data.
Carbon accountant
HowGoodprepared the 2023 figures
Contact Info
Website
ebrofoods.esCountry
Spain
Browse carbon emissions data by industry
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
How scoring works
How the Mycelium Score is calculated
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.
How the Transparency Score is calculated
The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.
Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro has disclosed the categories that carry most of its estimated footprint, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows which figures are reported and which are modelled.
Read the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)Compare Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro with similar companies
Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro carbon emissions FAQs
What are Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro's carbon emissions?
In its 2023 reporting year, Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro disclosed total emissions of 5,670,704 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 5,686,984 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 96%.
Does Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?
For 2023, Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (168,777 tCO2e), Scope 2 (84,619 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 12 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
How transparent is Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro's emissions reporting?
Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro has a Mycelium transparency score of 99.9 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.
Is Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro sustainable?
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro has a Mycelium Score of 2.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.
Is Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro environmentally friendly?
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Ebro Foods / Grupo Ebro disclosed 5,670,704 tCO2e for 2023, and its Mycelium Score of 2.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.