Direct emissions
210,654
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for Grange Resources. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Grange Resources, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
430,842 tCO2e (Location Based)
Scope 1
tCO2e
210,654
Scope 2 (Location Based)
tCO2e
48,876
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
171,312
Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.
When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, Grange Resources reported total yearly emissions of 430,842 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 1 emissions accounted for 49% of reported output, indicating direct emissions from owned facilities, fleet vehicles, and on-site fuel combustion were the leading contributors to the company's footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.3, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 8.0, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.
Total Emissions across all scopes
430,842 tCO2e (Location Based)
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
210,654
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
48,876
tCO2eMarket based
–
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
59,750
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
2,962
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
5,030
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
5,850
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
298
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
298
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
298
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
2,627
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
279
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
73,891
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
14,327
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
279
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
279
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
279
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
4,863
tCO2e15 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Grange Resources's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.
The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.
For Grange Resources, the single biggest gap is Processing of sold products (Scope 3 Category 10). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 17% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Materials company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.
Other material categories Grange Resources hasn't disclosed:
In total, roughly 34% of Grange Resources's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
In its 2025 reporting year, Grange Resources disclosed total emissions of 430,842 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 1 accounted for the largest share, around 49% of the total.
For 2025, Grange Resources's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (210,654 tCO2e), Scope 2 (48,876 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Grange Resources has a Mycelium transparency score of 8 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Grange Resources has a Mycelium Score of 0.3 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Grange Resources disclosed 430,842 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 0.3 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.