Back to search results

IGB Real Estate Investment Trust

0.8

Explore carbon emissions data for IGB Real Estate Investment Trust. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for IGB Real Estate Investment Trust, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

150,124tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by IGB Real Estate Investment Trust
116,068 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
34,056 tCO₂e

IGB Real Estate Investment Trust reported 77% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 23% for the categories it did not disclose. IGB Real Estate Investment Trust reported a Scope 3 total of 63,548 tCO₂e but did not break it down into the 15 categories. The model of the categories it did not report comes to more than that, so the adjusted total counts the model, with the reported figure inside it.

Scope 1

tCO2e

5,515

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

47,005

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

97,604

Figures from pages 12 and 44 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.483kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • IGB Real Estate Investment Trust reported 116,068 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 55% of reported emissions.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, IGB Real Estate Investment Trust reported total yearly emissions of 116,068 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 55% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.8, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 50.7, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

5,515

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

47,005

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

IGB Real Estate Investment Trust reported a Scope 3 total of 63,548 tCO₂e but did not break it down into the 15 categories. Mycelium's model of the categories it did not report comes to more than that, so the estimates below replace it in the adjusted total, with the reported figure counted inside them. The reported figure is not discarded, and you can see it in the downloads below.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

2,608

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

7,112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

525

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

281

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

375

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

173

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

197

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

231

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

33,567

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

35,667

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

458

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

15,273

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

1,138

tCO2e

13 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. The company's own Scope 3 total is reported, it was simply filed as a single figure with no category split. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Contact Info

Website

–

Country

Malaysia

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For IGB Real Estate Investment Trust, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 24% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories IGB Real Estate Investment Trust hasn't disclosed:

  • Downstream transportation & distribution (Scope 3 Category 9), around 22% of the estimated footprint
  • Downstream leased assets (Scope 3 Category 13), around 10% of the estimated footprint
  • Capital goods (Scope 3 Category 2), around 5% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 65% of IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare IGB Real Estate Investment Trust with similar companies

IGB Real Estate Investment Trust carbon emissions FAQs

What are IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, IGB Real Estate Investment Trust disclosed total emissions of 116,068 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 150,124 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 55%.

Does IGB Real Estate Investment Trust report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (5,515 tCO2e), Scope 2 (47,005 tCO2e) and a Scope 3 total of 63,548 tCO2e without a category breakdown. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is IGB Real Estate Investment Trust's emissions reporting?

IGB Real Estate Investment Trust has a Mycelium transparency score of 50.7 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is IGB Real Estate Investment Trust sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. IGB Real Estate Investment Trust has a Mycelium Score of 0.8 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.

Is IGB Real Estate Investment Trust environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. IGB Real Estate Investment Trust disclosed 116,068 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 0.8 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.