Back to search results

K2 Strategic

Explore carbon emissions data for K2 Strategic. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for K2 Strategic, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

622tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by K2 Strategic
587 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
35 tCO₂e

K2 Strategic reported 94% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 6% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

29

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

558

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

35

Figures from pages 20 and 44 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind K2 Strategic's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • K2 Strategic reported 587 tCO₂e in 2023.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, K2 Strategic reported total yearly emissions of 587 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 2 emissions accounted for 95% of the reported footprint, indicating purchased energy was the most significant contributor to its carbon footprint.

The company does not have a Mycelium Score for 2023, because there is no revenue figure on file to measure its carbon intensity.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

29

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

558

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

–

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

–

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

–

tCO2e

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

3

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

12

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

20

tCO2e

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 11

Use of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e

Cat 15

Investments

–

tCO2e

3 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed, and Mycelium can't model them without a revenue figure for K2 Strategic, which it doesn't have yet.

Contact Info

Website

–

Country

United States of America

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For K2 Strategic, the single biggest gap is Employee commuting (Scope 3 Category 7). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 3% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

In total, roughly 6% of K2 Strategic's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare K2 Strategic with similar companies

K2 Strategic carbon emissions FAQs

What are K2 Strategic's carbon emissions?

In its 2023 reporting year, K2 Strategic disclosed total emissions of 587 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 622 tCO2e. Scope 2 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 95%.

Does K2 Strategic report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2023, K2 Strategic's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (29 tCO2e) and Scope 2 (558 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

Is K2 Strategic sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. K2 Strategic does not have a Mycelium Score for 2023 yet. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.

Is K2 Strategic environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. K2 Strategic disclosed 587 tCO2e for 2023. It does not have a Mycelium Score yet to compare that with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.