Back to search results

Kordsa Teknik Tekstil

Explore carbon emissions data for Kordsa Teknik Tekstil. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Kordsa Teknik Tekstil, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

1,907,243tCO2e(Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

121,152

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

202,418

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

1,583,673

Figures from pages 32 and 34 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.721kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Kordsa Teknik Tekstil reported 1,907,243 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 83% of reported emissions.
  • Reported across 4 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Kordsa Teknik Tekstil reported total yearly emissions of 1,907,243 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 83% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.5, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 25.3, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

121,152

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

278,423

tCO2e
REPORTED

Market based USED IN TOTAL

202,418

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Kordsa Teknik Tekstil reported 1,583,673 tCO₂e of Scope 3 emissions beyond its breakdown into categories. That is at least as much as Mycelium's model of the categories it did not report, so the reported figure stands in the total, and the estimates below show where it is likely to sit.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

261,679

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

10,428

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

7,364

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

17,327

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

1,764

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

2,002

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

3,915

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

0

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

13,738

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

13,583

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

0

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

6,763

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

886

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 14

Franchises

0

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 15

Investments

0

tCO2e

11 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Part of the company's own Scope 3 was filed without a category, so it has no cell of its own. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(limited assurance)by DRT Bağımsız Denetim ve Serbest Muhasebeci Mali Müşavirlik A.Ş.for 2024

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2030

Long-term target

Targets set, target year 2050

Net zero

Targets set, target year 2050

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Country

Türkiye

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

Kordsa Teknik Tekstil reported 1,583,673 tCO₂e of Scope 3 emissions beyond its breakdown into categories. It counts towards the footprint, but only a tenth of it counts as disclosed in the transparency score, because it does not show which categories it covers. Breaking it down would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare Kordsa Teknik Tekstil with similar companies

Kordsa Teknik Tekstil carbon emissions FAQs

What are Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, Kordsa Teknik Tekstil disclosed total emissions of 1,907,243 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 83%.

Does Kordsa Teknik Tekstil report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (121,152 tCO2e), Scope 2 (202,418 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 4 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Kordsa Teknik Tekstil's emissions reporting?

Kordsa Teknik Tekstil has a Mycelium transparency score of 25.3 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is Kordsa Teknik Tekstil sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Kordsa Teknik Tekstil has a Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Kordsa Teknik Tekstil environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Kordsa Teknik Tekstil disclosed 1,907,243 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.