Back to search results

Explore carbon emissions data for LocknLock Co.. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for LocknLock Co., including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

189,681tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by LocknLock Co.
22,123 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
167,558 tCO₂e

LocknLock Co. reported 12% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 88% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

1,839

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

22,123

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

165,719

Figures from pages 25 and 90 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind LocknLock Co.'s emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.265kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • LocknLock Co. reported 22,123 tCO₂e in 2021.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, LocknLock Co. reported total yearly emissions of 22,123 tCO₂e in 2021. Scope 2 emissions accounted for 100% of the reported footprint, indicating purchased energy was the most significant contributor to its carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.8, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 16.0, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

ESTIMATED

Direct emissions

1,839

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

22,123

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

67,666

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

1,943

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

3,772

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

14,651

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

3,980

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

1,045

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

3,502

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

225

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

9,653

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

7,115

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

12,459

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

11,812

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

18,286

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

3,222

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

6,387

tCO2e

16 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing LocknLock Co.'s emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(limited assurance)by Korean Standards Association (KSA)for 2021

Contact Info

Country

South Korea

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. LocknLock Co.'s score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For LocknLock Co., the single biggest gap is Purchased goods & services (Scope 3 Category 1). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 36% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories LocknLock Co. hasn't disclosed:

  • Downstream leased assets (Scope 3 Category 13), around 10% of the estimated footprint
  • Upstream transportation & distribution (Scope 3 Category 4), around 8% of the estimated footprint
  • Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11), around 7% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 88% of LocknLock Co.'s estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare LocknLock Co. with similar companies

LocknLock Co. carbon emissions FAQs

What are LocknLock Co.'s carbon emissions?

In its 2021 reporting year, LocknLock Co. disclosed total emissions of 22,123 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 189,681 tCO2e. Scope 2 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 100%.

Does LocknLock Co. report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2021, LocknLock Co.'s available disclosure covers Scope 2 (22,123 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is LocknLock Co.'s emissions reporting?

LocknLock Co. has a Mycelium transparency score of 16.0 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is LocknLock Co. sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. LocknLock Co. has a Mycelium Score of 0.8 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.

Is LocknLock Co. environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. LocknLock Co. disclosed 22,123 tCO2e for 2021, and its Mycelium Score of 0.8 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.