Direct emissions
32,521
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
1,963,436tCO2e(Market Based)(Mycelium adjusted)
Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. reported 26% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 74% for the categories it did not disclose.
Scope 1
tCO2e
32,521
Scope 2 (Market Based)
tCO2e
78,581
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
1,852,334
Figures from pages 63 and 158 of the source report
Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset
See the scope breakdownPer US dollar of revenue. Mycelium models the upstream factor only.
Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. Any of those emissions the company has not disclosed are filled with modelled estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.
Looking at what the company filed itself? Use the Reported column. Total Reported also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Upstream Reported sits close to Upstream Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its upstream emissions.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. reported total yearly emissions of 504,402 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 78% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 1.8, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 58.0, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
32,521
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
–
tCO2eMarket based
78,581
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
259,600
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
55,900
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
22,700
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
18,000
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
14,700
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
800
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
2,500
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
1,148
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
1,400
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
43,886
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
1,373,971
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
17,300
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
400
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
5,470
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
34,559
tCO2e5 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.
Website
www.nipponkayaku.co.jpCountry
Japan
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.'s score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.
The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.
For Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 70% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.
In total, roughly 74% of Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.'s estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
In its 2025 reporting year, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. disclosed total emissions of 504,402 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 1,963,436 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 78%.
For 2025, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.'s available disclosure covers Scope 1 (32,521 tCO2e), Scope 2 (78,581 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 10 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. has a Mycelium transparency score of 58.0 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. has a Mycelium Score of 1.8 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd. disclosed 504,402 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 1.8 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.