Back to search results

IHC Caland

Explore carbon emissions data for IHC Caland. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for IHC Caland, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

10,687,358tCO2e(Market Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by IHC Caland
7,924,188 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
2,763,170 tCO₂e

IHC Caland reported 74% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 26% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

79

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

708

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

10,686,571

Figures from pages 105 and 128 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind IHC Caland's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.066kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • IHC Caland reported 7,924,188 tCO₂e in 2025.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 100% of reported emissions.
  • Reported across 3 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, IHC Caland reported total yearly emissions of 7,924,188 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 100% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.5, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 91.3, an exceptional result, reflecting open disclosure across nearly every key emissions metric.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

79

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

1,899

tCO2e
REPORTED

Market based USED IN TOTAL

708

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

REPORTED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

266,257

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

42,265

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

6,290

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

23,246

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

308

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 6

Business travel

36,096

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

4,136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

9,055

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

17,500

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

430,761

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

2,044,920

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

369

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

7,621,048

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

184,321

tCO2e

11 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing IHC Caland's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(limited assurance)by Deloitte Accountants B.V.for 2025

Contact Info

Country

Netherlands

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. IHC Caland's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For IHC Caland, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 19% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories IHC Caland hasn't disclosed:

  • Processing of sold products (Scope 3 Category 10), around 4% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 26% of IHC Caland's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare IHC Caland with similar companies

IHC Caland carbon emissions FAQs

What are IHC Caland's carbon emissions?

In its 2025 reporting year, IHC Caland disclosed total emissions of 7,924,188 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 10,687,358 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 100%.

Does IHC Caland report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2025, IHC Caland's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (79 tCO2e), Scope 2 (708 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 3 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is IHC Caland's emissions reporting?

IHC Caland has a Mycelium transparency score of 91.3 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is IHC Caland sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. IHC Caland has a Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.

Is IHC Caland environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. IHC Caland disclosed 7,924,188 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 0.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.