Back to search results

SK Biopharmaceuticals

0.3

Explore carbon emissions data for SK Biopharmaceuticals. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for SK Biopharmaceuticals, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

41,857tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by SK Biopharmaceuticals
1,362 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
40,495 tCO₂e

SK Biopharmaceuticals reported 3% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 97% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

426

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

937

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

40,495

Figures from page 149 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind SK Biopharmaceuticals's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.140kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • SK Biopharmaceuticals reported 1,362 tCO₂e in 2022.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, SK Biopharmaceuticals reported total yearly emissions of 1,362 tCO₂e in 2022. Scope 2 emissions accounted for 69% of the reported footprint, indicating purchased energy was the most significant contributor to its carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.3, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 4.5, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

426

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

937

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

14,665

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

2,283

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

6,738

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

885

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

106

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

169

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

227

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

227

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

845

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

4,549

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

5,676

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

562

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

1,851

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

676

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

1,036

tCO2e

15 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing SK Biopharmaceuticals's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(limited assurance)by Korean Foundation for Qualityfor 2022

Contact Info

Website

–

Country

South Korea

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. SK Biopharmaceuticals's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For SK Biopharmaceuticals, the single biggest gap is Purchased goods & services (Scope 3 Category 1). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 35% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories SK Biopharmaceuticals hasn't disclosed:

  • Fuel & energy related activities (Scope 3 Category 3), around 16% of the estimated footprint
  • Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11), around 14% of the estimated footprint
  • Processing of sold products (Scope 3 Category 10), around 11% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 97% of SK Biopharmaceuticals's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare SK Biopharmaceuticals with similar companies

SK Biopharmaceuticals carbon emissions FAQs

What are SK Biopharmaceuticals's carbon emissions?

In its 2022 reporting year, SK Biopharmaceuticals disclosed total emissions of 1,362 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 41,857 tCO2e. Scope 2 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 69%.

Does SK Biopharmaceuticals report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2022, SK Biopharmaceuticals's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (426 tCO2e) and Scope 2 (937 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is SK Biopharmaceuticals's emissions reporting?

SK Biopharmaceuticals has a Mycelium transparency score of 4.5 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is SK Biopharmaceuticals sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. SK Biopharmaceuticals has a Mycelium Score of 0.3 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures and disclosure documents on this page give the fuller picture.

Is SK Biopharmaceuticals environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. SK Biopharmaceuticals disclosed 1,362 tCO2e for 2022, and its Mycelium Score of 0.3 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.