Back to search results

The Wharf

Explore carbon emissions data for The Wharf. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for The Wharf, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

866,251tCO2e(Market Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by The Wharf
461,148 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
405,103 tCO₂e

The Wharf reported 53% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 47% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

16,961

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

100,898

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

748,392

Figures from pages 37 and 68 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind The Wharf's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.172kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • The Wharf reported 461,148 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 74% of reported emissions.
  • Reported across 11 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, The Wharf reported total yearly emissions of 461,148 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 74% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 3.5, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 82.0, meaning they share solid detail across the main emissions areas.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

16,961

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

141,411

tCO2e
REPORTED

Market based USED IN TOTAL

100,898

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

REPORTED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

31,152

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 2

Capital goods

70,422

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

19,575

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

14,521

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

5,678

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 6

Business travel

420

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

4,129

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

2,974

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

393,046

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

–

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

116,419

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

19,490

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

58,509

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

12,056

tCO2e

2 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing The Wharf's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(reasonable assurance)by Hong Kong Quality Assurance Agency (HKQAA)for 2024

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2030

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Country

Hong Kong

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. The Wharf's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For The Wharf, the single biggest gap is Downstream transportation & distribution (Scope 3 Category 9). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 45% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

In total, roughly 47% of The Wharf's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare The Wharf with similar companies

The Wharf carbon emissions FAQs

What are The Wharf's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, The Wharf disclosed total emissions of 461,148 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 866,251 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 74%.

Does The Wharf report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, The Wharf's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (16,961 tCO2e), Scope 2 (100,898 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 11 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is The Wharf's emissions reporting?

The Wharf has a Mycelium transparency score of 82.0 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is The Wharf sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. The Wharf has a Mycelium Score of 3.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is The Wharf environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. The Wharf disclosed 461,148 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 3.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.