Back to search results

Explore carbon emissions data for VP Capital. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for VP Capital, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

82tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by VP Capital
20 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
62 tCO₂e

VP Capital reported 24% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 76% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

–

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

20

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

62

Not yet checked against the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind VP Capital's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • VP Capital reported 20 tCO₂e in 2021.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, VP Capital reported total yearly emissions of 20 tCO₂e in 2021. Scope 2 emissions accounted for 100% of the reported footprint, indicating purchased energy was the most significant contributor to its carbon footprint.

The company does not have a Mycelium Score for 2021, because there is no revenue figure on file to measure its carbon intensity.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

–

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

20

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

–

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

–

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

–

tCO2e

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

0

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

54

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

7

tCO2e

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 11

Use of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e

Cat 15

Investments

–

tCO2e

3 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed, and Mycelium can't model them without a revenue figure for VP Capital, which it doesn't have yet.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing VP Capital's emissions data.

Carbon accountant

CO2logicprepared the 2021 figures

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2030

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Country

Belgium

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For VP Capital, the single biggest gap is Business travel (Scope 3 Category 6). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 66% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories VP Capital hasn't disclosed:

  • Employee commuting (Scope 3 Category 7), around 9% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 76% of VP Capital's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare VP Capital with similar companies

VP Capital carbon emissions FAQs

What are VP Capital's carbon emissions?

In its 2021 reporting year, VP Capital disclosed total emissions of 20 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 82 tCO2e. Scope 2 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 100%.

Does VP Capital report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2021, VP Capital's available disclosure covers Scope 2 (20 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

Is VP Capital sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. VP Capital does not have a Mycelium Score for 2021 yet. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is VP Capital environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. VP Capital disclosed 20 tCO2e for 2021. It does not have a Mycelium Score yet to compare that with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.