Back to search results

Warner Music Group

Explore carbon emissions data for Warner Music Group. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Warner Music Group, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

1,353,437tCO2e(Location Based)(Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by Warner Music Group
233,251 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
1,120,186 tCO₂e

Warner Music Group reported 17% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 83% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

2,249

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

6,599

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

1,344,589

Figures from pages 25 and 37 of the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Warner Music Group's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factorScope 1, 2 and upstream Scope 3 (categories 1–8)
0.031kgCO2e / $

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Warner Music Group reported 233,251 tCO₂e in 2025.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 96% of reported emissions.
  • Reported across 6 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Warner Music Group reported total yearly emissions of 233,251 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 96% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 2.5, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 45.0, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

2,249

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

6,599

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

REPORTED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

110,339

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 2

Capital goods

8,589

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

1,746

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

8,547

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

209

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 6

Business travel

25,531

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

14,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

4,700

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

57,035

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

927,624

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

150,880

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

1,007

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

17,370

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

4,521

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

12,130

tCO2e

9 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing Warner Music Group's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured(limited assurance)by external auditorfor 2025

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2033

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Website

wmg.com

Country

United States of America

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Warner Music Group's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.

For Warner Music Group, the single biggest gap is Processing of sold products (Scope 3 Category 10). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 69% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories Warner Music Group hasn't disclosed:

  • Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11), around 11% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 83% of Warner Music Group's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paperRead the full scoring methodologyOur white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10.Download the white paper (PDF)

Compare Warner Music Group with similar companies

Warner Music Group carbon emissions FAQs

What are Warner Music Group's carbon emissions?

In its 2025 reporting year, Warner Music Group disclosed total emissions of 233,251 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 1,353,437 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 96%.

Does Warner Music Group report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2025, Warner Music Group's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (2,249 tCO2e), Scope 2 (6,599 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 6 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Warner Music Group's emissions reporting?

Warner Music Group has a Mycelium transparency score of 45.0 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is Warner Music Group sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Warner Music Group has a Mycelium Score of 2.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Warner Music Group environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Warner Music Group disclosed 233,251 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 2.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.