Direct emissions
751
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for BUTTING. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for BUTTING, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
301,833 tCO2e (Market Based)
Scope 1
tCO2e
751
Scope 2 (Market Based)
tCO2e
22
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
301,060
Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.
When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, BUTTING reported total yearly emissions of 301,833 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 100% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 2.9, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 51.5, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.
Total Emissions across all scopes
301,833 tCO2e (Market Based)
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
751
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
–
tCO2eMarket based
22
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
150
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
6,687
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
1
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
3
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
2
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
216
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
2
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
6,687
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
6,687
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
6,687
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
253,867
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
6,687
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
6,687
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
6,687
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
8
tCO2e8 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. BUTTING's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.
The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.
For BUTTING, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 84% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Materials company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.
In total, roughly 84% of BUTTING's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
In its 2024 reporting year, BUTTING disclosed total emissions of 301,833 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 100% of the total.
For 2024, BUTTING's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (751 tCO2e), Scope 2 (22 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 7 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
BUTTING has a Mycelium transparency score of 51.5 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. BUTTING has a Mycelium Score of 2.9 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. BUTTING disclosed 301,833 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 2.9 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.