Direct emissions
1,760,000
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for Mondi Group. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Mondi Group, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
13,442,084tCO2e(Market Based)(Mycelium adjusted)
Mondi Group reported 55% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 45% for the categories it did not disclose.
Scope 1
tCO2e
1,760,000
Scope 2 (Market Based)
tCO2e
360,000
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
11,322,084
Figures from page 5 of the source report
Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset
See the scope breakdownPer US dollar of revenue. Mycelium models the upstream factor only.
Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. Any of those emissions the company has not disclosed are filled with modelled estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.
Looking at what the company filed itself? Use the Reported column. Total Reported also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Upstream Reported sits close to Upstream Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its upstream emissions.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, Mondi Group reported total yearly emissions of 7,410,000 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 71% of the reported footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 2.2, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 82.8, meaning they share solid detail across the main emissions areas.
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
1,760,000
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
560,000
tCO2eMarket based USED IN TOTAL
360,000
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
3,010,000
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
140,000
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
440,000
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
440,000
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
60,000
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
10,000
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
20,000
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
36,884
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
530,000
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
400,000
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
5,958,895
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
230,000
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
6,894
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
29,411
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
10,000
tCO2e4 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium.
Near-term target
Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2030
Long-term target
Targets set, target year 2050
Net zero
Targets set, target year 2050
Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.
Website
mondigroup.comCountry
United Kingdom
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs peers in the same NACE section (emissions normalised against revenue, log-scaled between the 5th and 95th percentile of each company's latest reporting year in that section; a section needs at least 5 companies to be benchmarked). The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0). The total is multiplied by the transparency score and capped at 10. A disclosure with an implausibly large figure (Scope 1 or 2 over 300 million tonnes, a Scope 3 figure over 2 billion tonnes or a total over 2.5 billion tonnes) is not scored until it has been checked.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Mondi Group's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel. Without a revenue figure to measure carbon intensity, or an industry classification to compare it within, a company has no score.
The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. Unreported downstream categories (9 to 15) count at a quarter of their modelled size in this share; the carbon intensity behind the score still counts them in full. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Without a revenue figure the footprint cannot be modelled, so the company has no Transparency Score.
For Mondi Group, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 44% of the company's estimated footprint, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.
In total, roughly 45% of Mondi Group's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
In its 2025 reporting year, Mondi Group disclosed total emissions of 7,410,000 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 13,442,084 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share of the reported total, around 71%.
For 2025, Mondi Group's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (1,760,000 tCO2e), Scope 2 (360,000 tCO2e) and Scope 3 across 11 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Mondi Group has a Mycelium transparency score of 82.8 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Mondi Group has a Mycelium Score of 2.2 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Mondi Group disclosed 7,410,000 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 2.2 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.