Back to search results

Accenture Finland

accenture.com 1.2

Explore carbon emissions data for Accenture Finland. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Accenture Finland, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

727,631 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

19,327

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

3,711

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

704,593

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Accenture Finland's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
2,151,657 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
68,125
68,125
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
2,112,067
2,103,752
Total + all Scope 3
2,151,657
2,103,752

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Accenture Finland reported 727,631 tCO₂e in 2025.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 97% of emissions.
  • Reported across 5 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Accenture Finland reported total yearly emissions of 727,631 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 97% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 1.2, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 70.8, meaning they share a fair amount, though with some gaps along the way.

Total Emissions across all scopes

727,631 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

19,327

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

tCO2e

Market based

3,711

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

302,715

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

36,729

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

28,377

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

937

tCO2e

Cat 6

Business travel

244,987

tCO2e

Cat 7

Employee commuting

75,585

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

7,764

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

937

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

937

tCO2e

10 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Address

Country

FIN

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Accenture Finland's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

Accenture Finland has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Accenture Finland carbon emissions FAQs

What are Accenture Finland's carbon emissions?

In its 2025 reporting year, Accenture Finland disclosed total emissions of 727,631 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 97% of the total.

Does Accenture Finland report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2025, Accenture Finland's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (19,327 tCO2e), Scope 2 (3,711 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 5 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Accenture Finland's emissions reporting?

Accenture Finland has a Mycelium transparency score of 70.8 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is Accenture Finland sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Accenture Finland has a Mycelium Score of 1.2 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Accenture Finland environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Accenture Finland disclosed 727,631 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 1.2 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.