Back to search results

ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana

0.0

Explore carbon emissions data for ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

12,917,860 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

41,778

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

23,997

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

12,852,085

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
286,403,139 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
1,458,304
1,458,304
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
51,959,367
51,574,586
Total + all Scope 3
286,403,139
285,925,400

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana reported 12,917,860 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 99% of emissions.
  • Reported across 2 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana reported total yearly emissions of 12,917,860 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 99% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.0, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 73.1, meaning they share a fair amount, though with some gaps along the way.

Total Emissions across all scopes

12,917,860 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

41,778

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

15,143

tCO2e

Market based

23,997

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

2,260,433

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

15,139

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

1,656

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

112

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

136

tCO2e

Cat 11

Use of sold products

10,570,104

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

3,513

tCO2e

13 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Website

Address

Country

SVN

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana carbon emissions FAQs

What are ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana disclosed total emissions of 12,917,860 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 99% of the total.

Does ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (41,778 tCO2e), Scope 2 (23,997 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 2 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana's emissions reporting?

ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana has a Mycelium transparency score of 73.1 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana has a Mycelium Score of 0 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. ADRIAPLIN, Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina d.o.o. Ljubljana disclosed 12,917,860 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 0 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.