Back to search results

AGC

agc.com 3.8

Explore carbon emissions data for AGC. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for AGC, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

19,934,129 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

5,781,404

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

4,131,848

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

10,020,877

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind AGC's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
1,903,211 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
946,468
946,468
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
1,577,751
1,577,407
Total + all Scope 3
1,903,211
1,902,014

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • AGC reported 19,934,129 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 50% of emissions.
  • Reported across 12 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, AGC reported total yearly emissions of 19,934,129 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 50% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 3.8, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 99.3, an exceptional result, reflecting open disclosure across nearly every key emissions metric.

Total Emissions across all scopes

19,934,129 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

5,781,404

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

4,395,249

tCO2e

Market based

4,131,848

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

3,737,772

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

725,090

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

1,059,771

tCO2e

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

939,601

tCO2e

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

37,512

tCO2e

Cat 6

Business travel

76,707

tCO2e

Cat 7

Employee commuting

31,969

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

3,607

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

4,466

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

483,456

tCO2e

Cat 11

Use of sold products

1,470,509

tCO2e

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

1,168,300

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

145,728

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

4,466

tCO2e

Cat 15

Investments

131,923

tCO2e

3 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (Well-below 2°C), target year 2030

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Website

www.agc.com

Address

Zahradní 836/60
415 01

Country

Czech Republic

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. AGC's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

AGC has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

AGC carbon emissions FAQs

What are AGC's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, AGC disclosed total emissions of 19,934,129 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 50% of the total.

Does AGC report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, AGC's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (5,781,404 tCO2e), Scope 2 (4,131,848 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 12 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is AGC's emissions reporting?

AGC has a Mycelium transparency score of 99.3 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is AGC sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. AGC has a Mycelium Score of 3.8 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is AGC environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. AGC disclosed 19,934,129 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 3.8 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.