Direct emissions
133,443
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for Arctic Paper. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Arctic Paper, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
1,163,091 tCO2e (Market Based)
Scope 1
tCO2e
133,443
Scope 2 (Market Based)
tCO2e
152,526
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
877,122
Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.
When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, Arctic Paper reported total yearly emissions of 1,163,091 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 75% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 2.8, placing it below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 76.9, meaning they share solid detail across the main emissions areas.
Total Emissions across all scopes
1,163,091 tCO2e (Market Based)
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
133,443
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
45,939
tCO2eMarket based
152,526
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
17,862
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
24,262
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
31,652
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
103,422
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
419
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
492
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
1,994
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
62
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
1,677
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
238,845
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
1,424
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
78,459
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
1,677
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
1,677
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
10
tCO2e4 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Arctic Paper's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.
The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.
Arctic Paper has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.
In its 2024 reporting year, Arctic Paper disclosed total emissions of 1,163,091 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 75% of the total.
For 2024, Arctic Paper's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (133,443 tCO2e), Scope 2 (152,526 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 11 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Arctic Paper has a Mycelium transparency score of 76.9 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Arctic Paper has a Mycelium Score of 2.8 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Arctic Paper disclosed 1,163,091 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 2.8 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.