Back to search results

Caixarenting

caixabankequipment.com 0.4

Explore carbon emissions data for Caixarenting. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Caixarenting, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

464,833 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

7,646

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

0

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

434,086

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Caixarenting's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
13,067,207 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
864,353
864,353
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
12,907,039
12,896,183
Total + all Scope 3
13,067,207
12,896,183

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Caixarenting reported 464,833 tCO₂e in 2025.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 93% of emissions.
  • Reported across 5 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Caixarenting reported total yearly emissions of 464,833 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 93% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.4, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 45.6, pointing to fairly limited disclosure, with notable gaps in key areas.

Total Emissions across all scopes

464,833 tCO2e (Market Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

7,646

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

23,101

tCO2e

Market based

0

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

278,801

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

73,287

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

4,136

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

129

tCO2e

Cat 6

Business travel

14,418

tCO2e

Cat 7

Employee commuting

57,360

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

4,925

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

129

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

129

tCO2e

10 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Address

AVENIDA MANOTERAS 20 EDIFICIO PARIS
Madrid
28050

Country

Spain

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Caixarenting's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

Caixarenting has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Caixarenting carbon emissions FAQs

What are Caixarenting's carbon emissions?

In its 2025 reporting year, Caixarenting disclosed total emissions of 464,833 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 93% of the total.

Does Caixarenting report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2025, Caixarenting's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (7,646 tCO2e), Scope 2 (0 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 5 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Caixarenting's emissions reporting?

Caixarenting has a Mycelium transparency score of 45.6 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is Caixarenting sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Caixarenting has a Mycelium Score of 0.4 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Caixarenting environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Caixarenting disclosed 464,833 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 0.4 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.