Direct emissions
1,358,410
tCO2e
Explore carbon emissions data for Coterra. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.
This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Coterra, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.
Total yearly emissions across all scopes
9,768,681 tCO2e (Location Based)
Scope 1
tCO2e
1,358,410
Scope 2 (Location Based)
tCO2e
248,029
Scope 3 total
tCO2e
8,162,242
Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.
Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.
When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.
Based on reported data, retrieved with AI
According to available emissions disclosures, Coterra reported total yearly emissions of 9,768,681 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 84% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.
The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.4, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 11.1, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.
Total Emissions across all scopes
9,768,681 tCO2e (Location Based)
Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.
Direct emissions
1,358,410
tCO2eIndirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.
Location based
248,029
tCO2eMarket based
–
tCO2eWider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.
Cat 1
Purchased goods & services
329,389
tCO2eCat 2
Capital goods
9,175
tCO2eCat 3
Fuel & energy related activities
134,875
tCO2eCat 4
Upstream transportation & distribution
9,175
tCO2eCat 5
Waste generated in operations
14,680
tCO2eCat 6
Business travel
9,175
tCO2eCat 7
Employee commuting
9,175
tCO2eCat 8
Upstream leased assets
9,175
tCO2eCat 9
Downstream transportation & distribution
21,103
tCO2eCat 10
Processing of sold products
113,772
tCO2eCat 11
Use of sold products
7,418,135
tCO2eCat 12
End-of-life treatment of sold products
21,103
tCO2eCat 13
Downstream leased assets
21,103
tCO2eCat 14
Franchises
21,103
tCO2eCat 15
Investments
21,103
tCO2e15 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.
Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.
The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.
A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Coterra's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.
The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.
For Coterra, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 76% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Power Generation company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.
Other material categories Coterra hasn't disclosed:
In total, roughly 79% of Coterra's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.
In its 2023 reporting year, Coterra disclosed total emissions of 9,768,681 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 84% of the total.
For 2023, Coterra's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (1,358,410 tCO2e), Scope 2 (248,029 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.
Coterra has a Mycelium transparency score of 11.1 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.
Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Coterra has a Mycelium Score of 0.4 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.
Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Coterra disclosed 9,768,681 tCO2e for 2023, and its Mycelium Score of 0.4 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.
Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.