Back to search results

Fuller Smith & Turner PLC

fullers.co.uk 1.5

Explore carbon emissions data for Fuller Smith & Turner PLC. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Fuller Smith & Turner PLC, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

138,052 tCO2e

Scope 1

tCO2e

5,921

Scope 2

tCO2e

5,921

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

126,211

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
366,866 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
31,467
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
188,628
139,067
Total + all Scope 3
366,866
164,374

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Fuller Smith & Turner PLC reported 138,052 tCO₂e in 2025.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 91% of emissions.
  • Reported across 5 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.

According to available emissions disclosures, Fuller Smith & Turner PLC reported total yearly emissions of 138,052 tCO₂e in 2025. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 91% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 1.5, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 35.6, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Total Emissions across all scopes

138,052 tCO2e

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

ESTIMATED

Direct emissions

5,921

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

ESTIMATED

Location based

5,921

tCO2e

Market based

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

30,330

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

14,960

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

1,362

tCO2e

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

7,041

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

1,362

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

52,101

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

1,362

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

5,663

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

1,362

tCO2e

Cat 15

Investments

3,860

tCO2e

12 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Climate targets

Science Based Targets initiative

Near-term target

Targets set (1.5°C), target year 2030

Source: Science Based Targets initiative, Companies Taking Action.

Contact Info

Address

Pier House
86-93 Strand On The Green
London
London
Greater London (Ealing)
W4 3NN

Country

United Kingdom

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

For Fuller Smith & Turner PLC, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 38% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Hospitality company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories Fuller Smith & Turner PLC hasn't disclosed:

  • Scope 1 (direct emissions), around 4% of the estimated footprint
  • Scope 2 (purchased energy), around 4% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 46% of Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Fuller Smith & Turner PLC carbon emissions FAQs

What are Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's carbon emissions?

In its 2025 reporting year, Fuller Smith & Turner PLC disclosed total emissions of 138,052 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 91% of the total.

Does Fuller Smith & Turner PLC report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2025, Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's available disclosure covers Scope 3 across 5 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Fuller Smith & Turner PLC's emissions reporting?

Fuller Smith & Turner PLC has a Mycelium transparency score of 35.6 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is Fuller Smith & Turner PLC sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Fuller Smith & Turner PLC has a Mycelium Score of 1.5 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Fuller Smith & Turner PLC environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Fuller Smith & Turner PLC disclosed 138,052 tCO2e for 2025, and its Mycelium Score of 1.5 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.