Back to search results

Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)

mangata.com.pl 0.6

Explore carbon emissions data for Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity). Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity), including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

230,410 tCO2e (Location Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

12,290

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

49,454

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

168,666

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
view full emissions profile

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

Carbon accountant

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
1,527,753 kgCO2e / £M

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £M)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
409,400
409,400
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
674,460
409,400
Total + all Scope 3
1,527,753
918,463

Which figure should I use?

Use Modelled. It is the most complete view: any categories the company hasn't disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company isn't unfairly penalised against one that simply hasn't reported.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell doesn't mean those emissions don't exist, just that the company hasn't disclosed them.

When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal. The company has disclosed most of its salient emissions and there's little gap for the model to fill. Even then, Modelled is the right figure to use for a like-for-like comparison across companies.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) reported 230,410 tCO₂e in 2023.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 73% of emissions.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) reported total yearly emissions of 230,410 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 73% of reported output, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 0.6, placing it well below average for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 16.0, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Total Emissions across all scopes

230,410 tCO2e (Location Based)

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

12,290

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

49,454

tCO2e

Market based

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

31,709

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

44,830

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

1,181

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

1,181

tCO2e

15 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed.

Structured data JSON-LD, Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model Spreadsheet CSV

Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model, by the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Address

BIELSKO-BIALA CECHOWA 6/8
BIELSKO-BIALA
43-300

Country

Poland

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue). The remaining 3.5 reflect data quality: third-party verified, profile claimed by the company, and full disclosure across all reporting categories.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score measures how much of a company's key emissions data is publicly disclosed, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Crucially, it weights each gap by how material that bucket is for the company's industry, so an undisclosed category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one.

For Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity), the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 29% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Manufacturing company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) hasn't disclosed:

  • Purchased goods & services (Scope 3 Category 1), around 21% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 50% of Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) carbon emissions FAQs

What are Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s carbon emissions?

In its 2023 reporting year, Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) disclosed total emissions of 230,410 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 73% of the total.

Does Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2023, Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s available disclosure covers Scope 1 (12,290 tCO2e), Scope 2 (49,454 tCO2e). Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity)'s emissions reporting?

Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) has a Mycelium transparency score of 16 out of 100. The score weights each emissions category by how material it is for the company's industry, so it reflects whether the disclosures that matter most have been made.

Is Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) has a Mycelium Score of 0.6 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Zetkama (Historical/Group Operating Entity) disclosed 230,410 tCO2e for 2023, and its Mycelium Score of 0.6 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.