Popular companies

Back to search results

AF Gruppen

afgruppen.no 8.3
Mycelium Score 8.3 / 10 An industry-leading score A Transparency Very High Extensive disclosure across almost all key areas

Explore carbon emissions data for AF Gruppen. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for AF Gruppen, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

676,834 tCO2e (Market Based) (Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by AF Gruppen
671,381 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
5,453 tCO₂e

AF Gruppen reported 99% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 1% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

41,042

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

23,472

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

612,320

Checked against page 104 of the source report on 4 Oct 2026

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind AF Gruppen's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

PDF Load PDF

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
0.312 kgCO2e / £

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
0.030
0.030
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
0.273
0.271
Total + all Scope 3
0.312
0.309

Scope 2 in these factors uses the company's market based figure.

Which figure should I use?

Comparing companies? Use Total Modelled. It is the most complete like-for-like view: any categories the company has not disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.

Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. The Total figure also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its salient emissions.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • AF Gruppen reported 671,381 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 90% of emissions.
  • Reported across 13 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, AF Gruppen reported total yearly emissions of 671,381 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 90% of the footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 8.3, placing it among the leaders in its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 99.2, an exceptional result, reflecting open disclosure across nearly every key emissions metric.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

41,042

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

1,912

tCO2e
REPORTED

Market based USED IN TOTAL

23,472

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

REPORTED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

470,959

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 2

Capital goods

12,422

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

11,863

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

18,711

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

5,711

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 6

Business travel

1,408

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

2,965

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

4,582

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

19,429

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

8,203

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

54,632

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

28

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

83

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

870

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 15

Investments

453

tCO2e

2 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing AF Gruppen's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured (limited assurance) by PricewaterhouseCoopers AS for 2024

Contact Info

Address

–

Country

NOR

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

Financial Services Manufacturing Retail Food & Beverage Health Care Transportation

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue), scaled by how transparent the reporting is. The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0), capped at 10.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. AF Gruppen's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Companies with nothing to model are graded on how much of their industry's typical footprint the reported categories cover.

AF Gruppen has disclosed the emissions categories that are material for its industry, so there's no single bucket dragging the transparency score down. The breakdown above shows full coverage across the categories that matter most for this kind of company.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

AF Gruppen carbon emissions FAQs

What are AF Gruppen's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, AF Gruppen disclosed total emissions of 671,381 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 676,834 tCO2e. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 90% of the total.

Does AF Gruppen report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, AF Gruppen's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (41,042 tCO2e), Scope 2 (23,472 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 13 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is AF Gruppen's emissions reporting?

AF Gruppen has a Mycelium transparency score of 99.2 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is AF Gruppen sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. AF Gruppen has a Mycelium Score of 8.3 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is AF Gruppen environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. AF Gruppen disclosed 671,381 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 8.3 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.