Popular companies

Back to search results

Aker BioMarine ASA

akerbiomarine.com 5.4
Mycelium Score 5.4 / 10 A mid-pack score C Transparency Moderate Moderate disclosure with some gaps

Explore carbon emissions data for Aker BioMarine ASA. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Aker BioMarine ASA, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

177,402 tCO2e (Market Based) (Mycelium adjusted)

Reported by Aker BioMarine ASA
111,327 tCO₂e
Estimated by Mycelium
66,075 tCO₂e

Aker BioMarine ASA reported 63% of the adjusted total. Mycelium estimated the remaining 37% for the categories it did not disclose.

Scope 1

tCO2e

93,981

Scope 2 (Market Based)

tCO2e

4,180

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

79,241

Checked against page 27 of the source report on 4 Oct 2026

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Aker BioMarine ASA's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Documents

PDF Load PDF

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
0.674 kgCO2e / £

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
0.373
0.373
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
0.459
0.398
Total + all Scope 3
0.674
0.423

Scope 2 in these factors uses the company's market based figure.

Which figure should I use?

Comparing companies? Use Total Modelled. It is the most complete like-for-like view: any categories the company has not disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.

Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. The Total figure also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its salient emissions.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Aker BioMarine ASA reported 111,327 tCO₂e in 2023.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 45% of emissions.
  • Reported across 4 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the market based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Aker BioMarine ASA reported total yearly emissions of 111,327 tCO₂e in 2023. Scope 1 emissions accounted for 53% of the footprint, indicating direct emissions from owned facilities, fleet vehicles, and on-site fuel combustion were the leading contributors to the company's footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 5.4, placing it mid-pack within its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 62.8, meaning they share a fair amount, though with some gaps along the way.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

93,981

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

3,698

tCO2e
REPORTED

Market based USED IN TOTAL

4,180

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

REPORTED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

1,800

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 2

Capital goods

7,479

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

4,197

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

3,877

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

2,087

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 6

Business travel

1,000

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

1,404

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

834

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

6,489

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

8,571

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

19,648

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

8,287

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

5,448

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

2,028

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

6,092

tCO2e

11 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing Aker BioMarine ASA's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured (limited assurance) by PricewaterhouseCoopers AS for 2023

Contact Info

Address

–

Country

NOR

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

Financial Services Manufacturing Retail Food & Beverage Health Care Transportation

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue), scaled by how transparent the reporting is. The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0), capped at 10.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Aker BioMarine ASA's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Companies with nothing to model are graded on how much of their industry's typical footprint the reported categories cover.

For Aker BioMarine ASA, the single biggest gap is Use of sold products (Scope 3 Category 11). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 11% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Agricultural Commodities company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

Other material categories Aker BioMarine ASA hasn't disclosed:

  • Processing of sold products (Scope 3 Category 10), around 5% of the estimated footprint
  • End-of-life treatment of sold products (Scope 3 Category 12), around 5% of the estimated footprint
  • Capital goods (Scope 3 Category 2), around 4% of the estimated footprint

In total, roughly 31% of Aker BioMarine ASA's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Aker BioMarine ASA carbon emissions FAQs

What are Aker BioMarine ASA's carbon emissions?

In its 2023 reporting year, Aker BioMarine ASA disclosed total emissions of 111,327 tCO2e across all scopes. Including Mycelium estimates for undisclosed categories, the adjusted total is 177,402 tCO2e. Scope 1 accounted for the largest share, around 53% of the total.

Does Aker BioMarine ASA report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2023, Aker BioMarine ASA's available disclosure covers Scope 1 (93,981 tCO2e), Scope 2 (4,180 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 4 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Aker BioMarine ASA's emissions reporting?

Aker BioMarine ASA has a Mycelium transparency score of 62.8 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is Aker BioMarine ASA sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Aker BioMarine ASA has a Mycelium Score of 5.4 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Aker BioMarine ASA environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Aker BioMarine ASA disclosed 111,327 tCO2e for 2023, and its Mycelium Score of 5.4 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.