Popular companies

Back to search results

Panther Grove I

panthergrovewind.com
F Transparency Very Low Minimal disclosure across key areas

Explore carbon emissions data for Panther Grove I. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Panther Grove I, including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

17,104 tCO2e

Scope 1

tCO2e

–

Scope 2

tCO2e

–

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

17,104

Not yet checked against the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Panther Grove I's emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
– kgCO2e / £

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
–
–
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
–
–
Total + all Scope 3
–
–

Which figure should I use?

Comparing companies? Use Total Modelled. It is the most complete like-for-like view: any categories the company has not disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.

Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. The Total figure also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its salient emissions.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Panther Grove I reported 17,104 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 100% of emissions.

According to available emissions disclosures, Panther Grove I reported total yearly emissions of 17,104 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions accounted for 100% of the footprint, indicating supply chain activity, purchased goods and services, business travel, and wider operational dependencies were the most significant contributors to the company's carbon footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of –, pending a benchmark for its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 6.0, pointing to very little public detail on their key emissions.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

Direct emissions

–

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

Location based

–

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

–

tCO2e

Cat 2

Capital goods

–

tCO2e

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

–

tCO2e

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

–

tCO2e

Cat 6

Business travel

–

tCO2e

Cat 7

Employee commuting

–

tCO2e

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

–

tCO2e

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 11

Use of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

–

tCO2e

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

–

tCO2e

Cat 14

Franchises

–

tCO2e

Cat 15

Investments

–

tCO2e
Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Verification

Independent third parties involved in checking or preparing Panther Grove I's emissions data.

Independent assurance

Independently assured (limited assurance) by Deloitte Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab for 2024

Contact Info

Address

–

Country

USA

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

Financial Services Manufacturing Retail Food & Beverage Health Care Transportation

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue), scaled by how transparent the reporting is. The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0), capped at 10.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Panther Grove I's score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Companies with nothing to model are graded on how much of their industry's typical footprint the reported categories cover.

For Panther Grove I, the single biggest gap is Scope 3 category breakdown (a total was filed without saying which categories it covers). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 90% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Paper & Forestry company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

In total, roughly 90% of Panther Grove I's estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Panther Grove I carbon emissions FAQs

What are Panther Grove I's carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, Panther Grove I disclosed total emissions of 17,104 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 3 accounted for the largest share, around 100% of the total.

How transparent is Panther Grove I's emissions reporting?

Panther Grove I has a Mycelium transparency score of 6 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.