Popular companies

Back to search results

Western Forest Products Inc.

westernforest.com 5.2
Mycelium Score 5.2 / 10 A mid-pack score A Transparency Very High Extensive disclosure across almost all key areas

Explore carbon emissions data for Western Forest Products Inc. Mycelium helps you review reported emissions, disclosure status, Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 data, climate targets and sustainability information in one company profile.

This profile brings together available carbon emissions data for Western Forest Products Inc., including reported figures, modelled estimates, disclosure documents and sustainability indicators, so you can review its emissions and compare its performance against similar companies. It is one entry in the Mycelium emissions database. Read how we source and check this data.

Claim this company

Emissions

Carbon emissions

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Total yearly emissions across all scopes

223,967 tCO2e (Location Based)

Scope 1

tCO2e

148,171

Scope 2 (Location Based)

tCO2e

3,899

Scope 3 total

tCO2e

71,897

Not yet checked against the source report

Scope 3 reported

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Something wrong? Contribute to this dataset

See the scope breakdown

Provenance

Review the sources and documents behind Western Forest Products Inc.'s emissions data. Provenance matters because it shows where the information comes from, how recent it is and how complete the disclosure appears to be.

Emissions
Factors

Modelled emission factor Total, all scopes including all Scope 3
0.378 kgCO2e / £

Supplier specific emission factors (kgCO2e / £)

Modelled
Reported
Scope 1 + 2 Direct + purchased energy
0.257
0.257
Upstream + upstream Scope 3
0.361
0.348
Total + all Scope 3
0.378
0.378

Scope 2 in these factors uses the company's location based figure.

Which figure should I use?

Comparing companies? Use Total Modelled. It is the most complete like-for-like view: any categories the company has not disclosed are filled with industry-typical estimates, so a transparent company is not unfairly penalised against one that simply has not reported.

Estimating your own supply-chain emissions from spend with this company? Use Upstream Modelled. The GHG Protocol defines purchased-goods emissions as cradle-to-gate, which means this company's own operations plus its upstream supply chain. The Total figure also includes downstream emissions, such as the lifetime use of the products this company sells, which the GHG Protocol attributes to the users of those products rather than to customers buying goods and services.

Reported counts only emissions the company has filed itself. A blank or low Reported cell does not mean those emissions do not exist, just that the company has not disclosed them. When Reported sits close to Modelled, that is a positive signal: the company has disclosed most of its salient emissions.

Sustainability
Snapshot

Based on reported data, retrieved with AI

  • Western Forest Products Inc. reported 223,967 tCO₂e in 2024.
  • Scope 3 accounted for 32% of emissions.
  • Reported across 3 of 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories.
  • Scope 2 reported under the location based methodology.

According to available emissions disclosures, Western Forest Products Inc. reported total yearly emissions of 223,967 tCO₂e in 2024. Scope 1 emissions accounted for 66% of the footprint, indicating direct emissions from owned facilities, fleet vehicles, and on-site fuel combustion were the leading contributors to the company's footprint.

The company achieved a Mycelium Score of 5.2, placing it mid-pack within its sector for sustainability performance, and received a transparency score of 92.8, an exceptional result, reflecting open disclosure across nearly every key emissions metric.

Scope
breakdown

Scope 1 emissions

Direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls, such as fuel use, facilities and vehicles.

REPORTED

Direct emissions

148,171

tCO2e

Scope 2 emissions

Indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating and cooling.

REPORTED

Location based

3,899

tCO2e

Market based

–

tCO2e

Scope 3 emissions

Wider value chain emissions across the 15 GHG Protocol categories, from purchased goods and business travel to investments, where reported.

ESTIMATED

Cat 1

Purchased goods & services

7,653

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 2

Capital goods

5,949

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 3

Fuel & energy related activities

20,229

tCO2e
REPORTED

Cat 4

Upstream transportation & distribution

27,785

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 5

Waste generated in operations

55

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 6

Business travel

53

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 7

Employee commuting

54

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 8

Upstream leased assets

53

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 9

Downstream transportation & distribution

1,044

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 10

Processing of sold products

3,409

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 11

Use of sold products

935

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

4,454

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 13

Downstream leased assets

60

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 14

Franchises

60

tCO2e
ESTIMATED

Cat 15

Investments

105

tCO2e

12 values were derived via Mycelium's normalisation process rather than reported by the company. A cell marked “ESTIMATED” is a figure the company did not disclose, modelled by Mycelium. Cells marked “–” were not disclosed and could not be modelled.

Structured data JSON-LD, OpenCCF Spreadsheet CSV
Open Corporate Carbon Footprint Data Model (OpenCCF) Schema and docs on GitHub By the Carbon Accounting Alliance with Murmurate Digital, Mycelium and Roundarc.

Contact Info

Address

800 - 1055 W Georgia Street
Royal Centre Building
PO Box 11122
Vancouver
V6E 3P3

Country

Canada

Browse carbon emissions data by industry

Jump straight into the sectors users explore most, or view all industries.

Financial Services Manufacturing Retail Food & Beverage Health Care Transportation

How scoring works

How the Mycelium Score is calculated

The Mycelium Score is out of 10. Up to 6.5 points reflect carbon intensity vs sector peers (emissions normalised against revenue), scaled by how transparent the reporting is. The band above 6.5 is earned through verified data quality on a claimed profile: declaring every reporting category yourself (up to 2.0), preparation by a carbon accountant (2.0) and independently audited figures (2.0), capped at 10.

A higher score means lower carbon intensity than sector peers, backed by data that's third-party verified, claimed by the company, and fully disclosed. Western Forest Products Inc.'s score sits at the top of this page and in the score panel.

How the Transparency Score is calculated

The Transparency Score is the share of a company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, graded from A (very high) down to F (very low). Where a category is missing, Mycelium models what it would hold for a company of that size and industry and counts it as undisclosed, so an unreported category where the bulk of emissions sit hurts far more than a minor one. A Scope 3 total filed without a category breakdown earns very little credit for the part left unattributed, because it does not show which categories are inside it: a company can count business travel, leave purchased goods out entirely, and the total looks the same. Companies with nothing to model are graded on how much of their industry's typical footprint the reported categories cover.

For Western Forest Products Inc., the single biggest gap is Scope 3 category breakdown (a total was filed without saying which categories it covers). Mycelium estimates it accounts for around 7% of the company's total footprint, typically the largest source of emissions for a Paper & Forestry company, yet it hasn't been disclosed. Leaving a bucket this large unreported is what's holding the transparency score down.

In total, roughly 7% of Western Forest Products Inc.'s estimated emissions sit in categories it hasn't reported. Disclosing these would be the fastest way to raise the transparency score.

Cover of Mycelium's scoring methodology white paper Read the full scoring methodology Our white paper covers exactly how the Mycelium Score and Transparency Score are calculated, including the normalisation process and what earns a 10/10. Download the white paper (PDF)

Western Forest Products Inc. carbon emissions FAQs

What are Western Forest Products Inc.'s carbon emissions?

In its 2024 reporting year, Western Forest Products Inc. disclosed total emissions of 223,967 tCO2e across all scopes. Scope 1 accounted for the largest share, around 66% of the total.

Does Western Forest Products Inc. report Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions?

For 2024, Western Forest Products Inc.'s available disclosure covers Scope 1 (148,171 tCO2e), Scope 2 (3,899 tCO2e), Scope 3 across 3 of the 15 GHG Protocol categories. Figures not reported by the company are shown as modelled estimates and labelled as such.

How transparent is Western Forest Products Inc.'s emissions reporting?

Western Forest Products Inc. has a Mycelium transparency score of 92.8 out of 100. The score is the share of the company's estimated footprint that it reported itself, so an undisclosed category where most of its emissions sit weighs far more than a minor one.

Is Western Forest Products Inc. sustainable?

Mycelium measures sustainability through carbon emissions data rather than giving a yes or no verdict. Western Forest Products Inc. has a Mycelium Score of 5.2 out of 10, which reflects its emissions intensity against sector peers together with how transparent and well-verified its reporting is. The emissions figures, disclosure documents and climate targets on this page give the fuller picture.

Is Western Forest Products Inc. environmentally friendly?

Carbon emissions are one measurable part of environmental impact, and the part Mycelium tracks. Western Forest Products Inc. disclosed 223,967 tCO2e for 2024, and its Mycelium Score of 5.2 out of 10 shows how that performance compares with similar companies in its sector.

Learn more about our methodology and where this data comes from.